Published Data
These pages provide an access point to data contained in CCFE published journal papers. By selecting a paper, and then a specific figure or table, you can request the related underlying data if it is available for release.
Publication Figures
Publication Date:
0000-00-00
First Author:
David Moulton
Title:
Using SOLPS to confirm the importance of parallel area expansion in Super-X divertors
Paper Identifier:
Search the list of Figures using keywords (case insensitive):
To drill down to information on Data within a published figure, select a table cell where the figure's number of Data Items > 0
Use the Download buttons to download information on each listed figure, e.g. the image file and how it was created
| Figure Reference | Title | Description | Number of Figure Data Items | Identifier | Download Figure Details | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figure 1 | Figure 1 | Minimally complex, isolated divertor leg grid for the $f_R=1.6$ case. Other grids, outlined in grey, were created by rotation about the X-point, keeping poloidal flux expansion fixed at unity and the parallel connection length fixed at $L=20$ m. The boundary conditions for surfaces (1)-(5) are given in section ref{sec:BC}. The toroidally symmetric pumping surfaces used for the density ramps to detachment, described in section ref{sec:DETACH}, are shown in green. Colour version available online. | 6 | CF/17/2 | Download | ||
| Figure 2 | Figure 2 | Simulated $n_t$ and $T_{et}$ as a function of $f_R$ for various simulation scans, as labelled. Values are plotted at the position of maximum target internal energy flux density. (a) and (b) show absolute values while (c) and (d) show the fractional changes relative to the $f_R=1$ case, with the modified two-point model scalings (ref{eq:NTSCALE}) and (ref{eq:TETSCALE}) shown for comparison (black lines). Colour version available online. | 0 | CF/17/3 | Download | ||
| Figure 3 | Figure 3 | Fractional changes from $f_R=1$ to $f_R=2$ in the 2nd to 5th factors in equation (ref{eq:2PMFNT2}) (figure a) and equation (ref{eq:2PMFTET2}) (figure b), explaining discrepancies between the modified 2PM and the SOLPS simulations. See text for details. Colour version available online. | 0 | CF/17/4 | Download | ||
| Figure 4 | Figure 4 | Comparison of equations (ref{eq:TCOND}) to the SOLPS-calculated upstream electron (a) and ion (b) temperatures for the high power $f_R$ scan. Cases where the target temperature is included and excluded are shown, as labelled. Arrows point in the direction of increasing $f_R$. Colour version available online. | 0 | CF/17/5 | Download | ||
| Figure 5 | Figure 5 | Transition from the sheath-limited to conduction-limited regimes as a function of $n_u$, for $f_R=1$ and $f_R=2$. The interpolated values of $n_u$ at which $T_{et}=T_{eu}/3$ are also shown. Colour version available online. | 0 | CF/17/6 | Download | ||
| Figure 6 | Figure 6 | Target plasma density (a) and target molecular density (b) as functions of the target electron temperature during upstream-density-driven detachment. Colours and marker are the same as figure ref{fig:ROLLOVERNU}. Colour version available online. | 0 | CF/17/7 | Download | ||
Loading... please wait...
